Agenda
- Proposals
- Delegate Balancer funds to treasury
- Guest pass revisions
- 40k L1 or 80k L1
- Tech infrastructure
- Discord <> Discourse roll sync
- Challenges
- tlBANK is meant to indicate alignment
- If you are paid in it, you may not aligned, you are coerced.
- Idea: ptlBANK - Paid tlBANK, that you can swap tlBANK or Unlocks
- This token identifies corerced people.
- Can you lock and load on behalf of someone else or do you need to only lock and load your own token?
- Control for this with the UI.
- If no lockup
- If lock for 6 months
- Lock n load for same time.
- OR lock and load, and extend for 6 months from payment date.
- Once you reach L1 - you can be paid in bank…..
- Same issue returns, they are not value aligned, but coerced.
- Summary
- We need to be comprehensive in version 1.0/1.5
- We are currently on 0.5
- Issues
- tlBANK is meant to indicate alignment
- It is chosen by the locker.
- If we pay people, they are coerced.
- We want aligned people getting rewards, not coerced.
- Payment overhead
- Gas usage on the different payments.
- Management….
- User overhead
- If someone is paid in 5k Increments the gas will be nuts
- For the user and the payor.
- Different unlock end dates
- Solutions
- Mult-tlBANK issue
- Lock and load on the token.
- Only 6 month increments…
- Aligned vs coerced
- ptlBANK - one solution
- GOOD - MORE primitives 😅
- Bad - more primitives 😞
- Restrict rights to 12 month lockups vs 6 month lockups.
- 12 month lockups are aligned, vs 6 month lock ups.
- Payment management and overhead
- User Managemetn and overhead
- INSTEAD OF PAYING IN TLBANK ALIGN LEADERS WITH TLBANK
- ALL roles require
- tlBANK = MORE governance votes